The State of the Markets:
I've been saying for some time now that I believe the current corrective/consolidation phase will ultimately be resolved to the upside. Or put another way, I don't think we're seeing the beginning of the next big, bad bear market.
This is not to say that the latter couldn't occur as there are at least a handful of issues the stock market is tight-roping over at the present time. There is the trade war. Rising rates. The potential for inflation. The ongoing drama in Washington. The debt/banking problems in Italy, et al. The geopolitical issues with folks like North Korea and Iran. The mid-term elections. An aging economic expansion. An old bull. And the subject of today's morning market missive: stock market valuations.
Nowhere is objectivity or, in many cases, a complete lack thereof, on display more than when the subject of market valuation is broached. Personally, I see valuations as a very tricky subject. And as such, I'm hesitant to take any strong stance. No, I'd rather recognize what "is" happening and let Ms. Market tell me when/if valuations will become a problem. If they ever do become a problem, that is.
Yet, a great many analysts insist on "planting the flag" on this issue by insisting stocks are overvalued - or just the opposite. This is the perplexing part. How can one respected analyst tell us with great certainty that valuations are reasonable while another, equally respected analyst says valuations are sky high and represent significant risk?
From my seat, I can actually see both arguments here. However, the key to the divergent views on market valuation is the perspective and time-frame one chooses to utilize.
For example, the chart below shows the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 using GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) going back more than 90 years.
S&P 500 GAAP Price/Earnings Ratio
View Larger Image Online
If one looks at the chart as a whole and reviews the entire 92-year period, it is easy to see why many believe stocks are expensive at this stage. Sure, the P/E has improved a bit this year. But from an absolute perspective, there can be no denying that the current GAAP P/E is elevated relative to history.
However, if one looks at the last 10 years, well, stocks actually look cheap. And a similar story can be told if you look back over the last 20 years, which, can be made to sound like a long time.
My take on the subject is we are either experiencing a new "era" of valuation ranges for the S&P (the current era or range began in the mid-1990's) - or - stocks are expensive here. Take your pick.
The next chart looks at the median stock's P/E in the S&P going back to 1964. The idea behind this approach is to remove the extremes in the data by using the median stock's P/E.
S&P 500 Median Price/Earnings Ratio
View Larger Image Online
This chart makes the two "eras" or valuation ranges quite clear. From the mid-1960's through the early 1990's, the range was obvious. But then as the great bull market of the 1990's took hold, the valuation range expanded. The highs were higher and the lows were lower.
Yet, it is fairly clear to me that regardless of which "era" you choose to look at, the current valuation level is lofty. In fact, the recent peak looks to be the third highest in history.
Finally, the analysts at Ned Davis Research Group have created what I'll call a normalized valuation composite, with data going back to 1926 again.
S&P 500 Normalized Composite Valuation Model
View Larger Image Online
The "normalized valuation" line is calculated by combining the median of different valuation measures based on: Dividends, Earnings, Cash Flow, Sales, Inflation-Adjust P/E, and Trend. Thus, this metric should represent a fairly complete picture of what I'll call absolute valuation measures.
Once again, I've drawn in my two "valuation eras" on the chart. So, again we are left with a dilemma. Is the current reading one of the highest of all-time or simply a bit past the mid-point of the current era?
Is It Different This Time?
Frankly, I always have a problem with "new eras" and "this time it's different" arguments. More often than not, it doesn't wind up being different this time, it just looks that way for a while.
However, I do think we need to recognize that the public's use of funds and the stock market has indeed changed since the 1980's. Yesterday's defined benefit pension plan, which was managed by professionals, has given way to defined contribution plans such as 401K's and the like. And the bottom line is the public is the one making the investment decisions today.
Next, I think it is important to recognize that the public doesn't do a lot of analysis before investing each month. No, they tend to simply plunk money automatically into their retirement plans and rarely, if ever, change the allocation to where the money is to be invested. As such, stock market valuations don't really impact this type of investing as the money just keeps flowing into the funds/ETFs in the plan.
So, is this a "new era" for valuations? Perhaps. Especially when you consider the level of interest rates. Again, where else is that money supposed to go when you have to tie up your cash for a decade in order to get anything close to 3% in the bond market?
The Bottom Line
Here's my bottom line take. Valuations are indeed high from an historical perspective. Yet, at the same time, with rates where they are, I don't see a lot of competition from a macro point of view. So, unless/until something comes along to (a) cause investors to freak out about valuations or (b) create competition for stocks, we may be stuck with this valuation dilemma for some time.
I see valuations as a risk factor that shouldn't be ignored. At the same time, I don't see valuations alone as a reason to move away from stocks. If/when the next big, bad bear begins, investors WILL care about valuations. And the high valuation levels will cause more pain during the ensuing bear than might have occurred if stocks weren't extremely overvalued. But until then, the money flows could very well keep valuations elevated.
As always, the key is to remain as objective as possible and to try and stay in line with whatever Ms. Market IS doing in the current market environment.
Each year, NAAIM (National Association of Active Investment Managers) hosts a competition to identify the best actively managed investment strategies. In April, HCR's Dave Moenning took home first place for his flagship risk management strategy.
Want to Learn More? Contact Dave
The best thing about the future is that it comes one day at a time. - Abraham Lincoln
Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,
David D. Moenning
Founder, Chief Investment Officer
Heritage Capital Research
HCR Focuses on a Risk-Managed Approach to Investing
Must Read: What Risk Management Can and Cannot Do
HCR's Financial Advisor Services
HCR's Individual Investor Services
Questions, comments, or ideas? Contact Us
At the time of publication, Mr. Moenning held long positions in the following securities mentioned: none - Note that positions may change at any time.
Today's Model Review:
LEADERS Model: The LEADERS currently holds 20% positions in the Consumer Discretionary, Technology, Health Care, Financials, and Energy sectors.
CORE Model (Risk Managed Exposure):
Today's CORE model's exposure target: 65%
Current CORE Model exposure: 75%
To review, the goal of this model is to stay in tune with the overall risk/reward environment. Therefore, we make adjustments only when there is a meaningful and sustained divergence between the target model reading and our current positions.
TRADING Model: We currently hold trades in gold, commodities, global technology, and the internet sector.
2018 YTD Performance Update:
DD LEADERS: +4.8%
S&P 500: +2.7%
|Daily Decision Trading Service
Current Portfolio Summary
|The LEADERS Model|
|% of |
|Technology Select Sector SPDR||XLK||20%||12.1.16||$46.64||Hold|
|Health Care Select Sector SPDR||XLV||20%||11.27.17||$81.79||Buy|
|Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR||XLY||20%||2.9.18||$99.67||Buy|
|Financials Select Sector SPDR||XLF||20%||2.12.18||$27.94||Buy|
|Energy Select Sector SPDR||XLE||20%||5.2.18||$73.57||Strong Buy|
|The CORE EXPOSURE Model|
|% of |
|SPDR S&P 500 ETF||SPY||37.5%||4.17.18||$269.78||Buy|
|iShares S&P Small-Cap||IJR||37.5%||4.17.18||$79.83||Buy|
|The TRADING Model|
|% of |
|PowerShares Commodity Index ETF||DBC||25%||5.2.18||$17.43||Strong Buy|
|First Trust Internet Index||FDN||25%||2.26.18||$124.00||Hold|
|iShares Global Technology||IXN||25%||2.26.18||$165.40||Buy|
|SPDR Gold Shares||GLD||25%||4.17.18||$127.27||Strong Buy|
% of Model Explained
The number shown in this column represents the percentage of the the model this position represents.
Current Rating Explained
This is our rating for the day. The Current Rating tells you what action we would take if we did not currently hold the position. A "Buy" rating means we would be willing to purchase the position at current prices. A "Strong Buy" suggests this would be our first choice to buy. A "Hold" rating indicates we would not make new purchases at current levels. And a "Sell" rating indicates we will likely exit the position in the near-term.
Positions Can Change
Positions often change during the trading session. Remember that we will send a Trade Alert via SMS Text Message and/or Email BEFORE we ever make a move in the models.
About the Daily Decision Models:
The Daily Decision is designed to be a simple, easy-to-follow e-letter service showcasing 3 different model portfolios. The LEADERS model is the flagship, growth oriented strategy that focuses on "where the action is" in terms of market leadership. The CORE model is a longer-term, risk-managed approach to keeping exposure to market risk in line with prevailing conditions. And as the name implies, the TRADING model is intended to be a tactical, opportunistic trading strategy.
Disclosure: At the time of publication, Mr. Moenning held long positions in the following securities mentioned: SPY, IJR XLK, XLV, XLY, XLF, DBC, FDN, IXN, GLD Note that positions may change at any time.
Wishing You All The Best in Your Investing Endeavors!
The Front Range Trading Team
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. The analysis and information in this report and on our website is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report or on our websites is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program. The opinions and forecasts expressed are those of the editors and may not actually come to pass. The opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations of any specific security nor specific investment advice. Investors should always consult an investment professional before making any investment.